Yoshihito Nishioka vs Harris Trismen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L W L
Form
L L W L L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Nishioka 1 - 0 Trismen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nishioka winning 2 and Trismen winning 0. The last match between Nishioka and Trismen was at the Sarasota Challenger, 13-04-2013, Q1 round, Clay with Yoshihito Nishioka getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yoshihito Nishioka | 1 |
| Harris Trismen | 0 |
Sarasota Challenger(13-04-2013)
6
0
6
1
| Nishioka | Stats | Trismen |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (9-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 74 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 24 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 33 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (432-276) | Career Total W/L | 33% (7-14) |
| $4,117,544 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Norrie PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Harris Trismen
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
32%
(
9 of
28)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:42:12 | Average Match Time | 0:42:12 |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve % | 32% (9/28) |
| 78% (18/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 67% (8/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 5% (1/19) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 86% (24/28) | Return Points Win % | 26% (9/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yoshihito Nishioka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Frances Tiafoe
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
80
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
70 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
85 of
135)
3
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
63 of
85)
66%
(
31 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
36 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
56 of
135)
137
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Harris Trismen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Harris Trismen
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Riaan Du Toit
Player
Harris Trismen
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (432/276) | Win/Loss | 33% (7/14) |
| 56% (973/750) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (17/29) |
| 52% (8312/7764) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (167/217) |
| 61% (243/153) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 60% (104/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) |
| 65% (72/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (13/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1170 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1010 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1:25:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 436.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 88.76 |
| 64% (27985/43750) | 1st Serve % | 53% (143/271) |
| 66% (18419/27985) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (83/143) |
| 53% (8398/15764) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (42/128) |
| 42% (1855/4434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 39% (17290/43924) | Return Points Win % | 34% (75/220) |
| 48% (35/38) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (56/51) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (14/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (122/85) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (134/71) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 76% (71/23) | Futures W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 64% (405/635) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 40% (25/63) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (122/213) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 67% (153/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 89% (394/349) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (8/6) |
| 10% (394/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (8/2) |
| 26% (314/82) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (13/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
